Home/D.C. Circuit/Welzant v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Welzant v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.

50 F. App'x 3
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 12, 2002
DocketNo. 01-7171
StatusPublished

This text of 50 F. App'x 3 (Welzant v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welzant v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., 50 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order and judgment filed September 17, 2001 be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion filed therewith.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 F. App'x 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welzant-v-merrill-lynch-pierce-fenner-smith-inc-cadc-2002.