Welzant v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.

D.C. Circuit

Welzant v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.

50 F. App'x 3

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 12, 2002·No. No. 01-7171·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order and judgment filed September 17, 2001 be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion filed therewith.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order and judgment filed September 17, 2001 be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion filed therewith.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Welzant v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., 50 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Pincite

50 F. App'x 3 (Welzant v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.