Welton v. Davis
This text of 6 Ky. 84 (Welton v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPI!.~.I9N qf the Court, by
-Daryls having coi~e~ced an ejectment in the Cta,~k circuit court; but failing to prosec~ite the same, the ~oUrt, on the ~tion 9f Welton, ordered it to be disfl~iSsed, ~ut f411.ed to give judgment for costs. 4t a subsequent term a m~tion was made t~ amei~d the ju~gment.by ftwar4ing costs, but t~ie rnotio~ v~a~s overrdled by the court.
[85]*85That Welton was entitled* to his costs expended ⅛ his defence to the ejectment,, we have no doubt. The court, on dismissing it, should, as an»inseparable incl* dent thereto, have entered judgment fb#4osts * not having done so, the judgment is erroneous and must be reversed with cUjffs ; the cause remanded, afid the an* tion dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Ky. 84, 3 Bibb 84, 1813 Ky. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welton-v-davis-kyctapp-1813.