Weltick v. Tufano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weltick v. Tufano

233 A.D. 875

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 A.D. 875 (Weltick v. Tufano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weltick v. Tufano, 233 A.D. 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion to dismiss the second cause of action in the complaint affirmed, without costs, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Summons amended under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act, by adding thereto as a plaintiff the name of Harry Weltick upon the ground that the name was omitted through mistake or inadvertence. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to dismiss the second cause of action in the complaint affirmed, without costs, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Summons amended under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act, by adding thereto as a plaintiff the name of Harry Weltick upon the ground that the name was omitted through mistake or inadvertence. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weltick-v-tufano-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack