Weltick v. Tufano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weltick v. Tufano

233 A.D. 875

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion to dismiss the second cause of action in the complaint affirmed, without costs, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Summons amended under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act, by adding thereto as a plaintiff the name of Harry Weltick upon the ground that the name was omitted through mistake or inadvertence. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to dismiss the second cause of action in the complaint affirmed, without costs, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Summons amended under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act, by adding thereto as a plaintiff the name of Harry Weltick upon the ground that the name was omitted through mistake or inadvertence. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Weltick v. Tufano, 233 A.D. 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

233 A.D. 875 (Weltick v. Tufano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related