Welt v. Love

546 So. 2d 1147, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1766, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4163, 1989 WL 81740
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 26, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1502
StatusPublished

This text of 546 So. 2d 1147 (Welt v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welt v. Love, 546 So. 2d 1147, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1766, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4163, 1989 WL 81740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment of the trial court accelerating the balance due on a promissory note, entering judgment thereon for the full principal balance due together with interest from the date of default, and awarding attorney’s fees based on section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1987).

The trial court erroneously accelerated the balance due when the note contained no acceleration clause. See Bardill v. Holcomb, 215 So.2d 64 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). The appellee was entitled to a judgment only for the payments past due at the time of the judgment plus interest accruing on each payment as it came due.

Because there was a justiciable issue with regard to the right to acceleration, the award of attorney’s fees under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1987) is also reversed.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

DOWNEY and WARNER, JJ., and WESSEL, JOHN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bardill v. Holcomb
215 So. 2d 64 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 So. 2d 1147, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1766, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4163, 1989 WL 81740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welt-v-love-fladistctapp-1989.