Welsher v. Libby, McNeil & Libby

82 N.W. 143, 106 Wis. 291, 1900 Wisc. LEXIS 38
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 20, 1900·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

WiNslow, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, a foreign corporation, from an order of the circuit court refusing to set aside the service of the summons and complaint, and imposing costs of motion. The appeal must be dismissed, because the order is not an order within the category of appealable orders contained in sec. 3069, Stats. 1898, nor is there any special statute making such order appealable. The idea seems to have been entertained that, because the order [292] imposed costs of motion, it should be treated as a judgment for the purposes of an appeal, such idea being founded upon inaccurate language used in Kingsley v. G. N. R. Co. 91 Wis. 380. This idea was distinctly rejected in Lewis v. C. & N. W. R. Co. 97 Wis. 368, and it is not necessary to further enlarge upon the subject.

By the Court.— Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Welsher v. Libby, McNeil & Libby, 82 N.W. 143, 106 Wis. 291, 1900 Wisc. LEXIS 38 (Wis. 1900).

82 N.W. 143 (Welsher v. Libby, McNeil & Libby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Motowski v. People's Dentists of Wisconsin
198 N.W. 465 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1924)
Tetley v. Rock Falls Manufacturing Co.
187 N.W. 204 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1922)
Lemon v. Aronson
164 N.W. 820 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1917)
Rix v. Sprague Canning Machinery Co.
147 N.W. 1001 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1914)
In re Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.
127 N.W. 998 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1910)
In re Dancy Drainage District
108 N.W. 202 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1906)