Welsh v. Town of Argyle

62 N.W. 517, 89 Wis. 649, 1895 Wisc. LEXIS 197
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 5, 1895·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

NewhaN, J.

It was obvious to Fisher that the road, though somewhat inconvenient for passage by reason of the ice over [651] it, was yet safe. It was obvious also tbat tbe creek was in a state of freshet. He realized that. He knew also that, while the stream might be safe to ford in ordinary water, it might be dangerous in time of freshet. He saw the situation. Three courses were open to him: He could follow the road and be safe, though with some inconvenience; he could take the chance of the ford; he could turn back and cross the stream at some other point,, also at some inconvenience. He chose the only course which was attended with danger. He chanced the ford, and the chance turned against him. It was his own choice, and not an apparent necessity, which led him to deviate from the safe but inconvenient way. In such a case the town is not liable. Kelley v. Fond du Lac, 31 Wis. 179; Hawes v. Fox Lake, 33 Wis. 438; Goeltz v. Ashland, 75 Wis. 642. The evidence does not support the verdict. A new trial should have been granted.

By the Court.— The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Welsh v. Town of Argyle, 62 N.W. 517, 89 Wis. 649, 1895 Wisc. LEXIS 197 (Wis. 1895).

62 N.W. 517 (Welsh v. Town of Argyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mueller v. City of Milwaukee
83 N.W.2d 735 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1957)
Sweetman v. City of Green Bay
132 N.W. 1111 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1912)
Coppins v. Town of Jefferson
105 N.W. 1078 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1906)
Krause v. City of Merrill
92 N.W. 231 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)
Sladky v. Marinette Lumber Co.
83 N.W. 514 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1900)
Rysdorp v. George Pankratz Lumber Co.
70 N.W. 677 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1897)