Welsh v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 43 A. 402 (Welsh v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In any view of the testimony in this case the negligence alleged against the defendant was the negligence of a co-employee, and [74]*74therefore there could be uo recovery. We do not understand that the habit of drunkenness on the part of Linville had anything to do with the cause of the accident. Without engaging in a detailed discussion of the testimony on the subject of his acts or omissions, it is in our judgment entirely insufficient to authorize a verdict against the defendant. The assignments of error are dismissed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 A. 402, 192 Pa. 69, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welsh-v-pennsylvania-railroad-pa-1899.