Welsh v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Welsh v. New York City Transit Authority

78 A.D.2d 550, 432 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12894

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 78 A.D.2d 550 (Welsh v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Welsh v. New York City Transit Authority, 78 A.D.2d 550, 432 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 29, 1979, as denied the branch of its motion for a protective order which sought to vacate plaintiffs notice for discovery and inspection with respect to certain physical descriptions of a number of defendant’s employees. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. It was not an abuse of discretion for Special Term to deny the said branch of the motion for a protective order. Defendant is not compelled to prepare new documents not previously in existence. Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 29, 1979, as denied the branch of its motion for a protective order which sought to vacate plaintiffs notice for discovery and inspection with respect to certain physical descriptions of a number of defendant’s employees. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. It was not an abuse of discretion for Special Term to deny the said branch of the motion for a protective order. Defendant is not compelled to prepare new documents not previously in existence. Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 550, 432 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welsh-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack