Welsh v. Lindo

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Welsh v. Lindo

29 F. Cas. 685, 1 Cranch 508

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided July 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THE COURT

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent)

was of opinion that the former recovery maj' be given in evidence on nil debet, and that parol evidence may be given to show, that although the action was indebita-tus assumpsit for goods sold and delivered, the judgment was really confessed for and upon the notes, and that this parol evidence was not contradictory to the record.

The plaintiff became nonsuit, with leave to move to reinstate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent)

was of opinion that the former recovery maj' be given in evidence on nil debet, and that parol evidence may be given to show, that although the action was indebita-tus assumpsit for goods sold and delivered, the judgment was really confessed for and upon the notes, and that this parol evidence was not contradictory to the record.

The plaintiff became nonsuit, with leave to move to reinstate.

Welsh v. Lindo, 29 F. Cas. 685, 1 Cranch 508 (circtddc 1808).

Pincite

29 F. Cas. 685 (Welsh v. Lindo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related