Welsh v. Kelsey

79 P. 1081, 71 Kan. 838, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 238
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedMarch 11, 1905
DocketNo. 13,981
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 P. 1081 (Welsh v. Kelsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welsh v. Kelsey, 79 P. 1081, 71 Kan. 838, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 238 (kan 1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only errors complained of in this case, except an order as to the distribution of the funds, relate to the findings of fact by the court, the principal question in dispute being whether a promissory note for $240 and interest, given by the plaintiff in error to the defendant in error, was to be regarded as paid, except as to the interest, in the sale of the partnership business to Klopfenstein & Wilson. As to this, and all other facts to which attention is called, there seems to be a conflict in the evidence. In fact, the weight of the evidence [839]*839seems to be in favor of tbe finding of the court that the proposition by which the note was to be considered canceled was never accepted nor carried out.

As to the order of the court requiring the receiver to pay over to the defendant all the moneys in his hands, after paying the debts of the firm of Klopfenstein & Wilson, without maldng any provision for the payment of the receiver, the order is perhaps erroneous; but it is not a matter of which the plaintiff in error can complain, as it does not affect him but affects only the receiver. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daggett v. Four Hundred Oil & Gas Co.
241 P. 467 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 P. 1081, 71 Kan. 838, 1905 Kan. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welsh-v-kelsey-kan-1905.