Welsh v. Casa Romantica by the Sea, J.V.

Ninth Circuit

Welsh v. Casa Romantica by the Sea, J.V.

786 F.2d 369, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23565

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 31, 1986·No. Nos. 85-5702, 85-5810·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks reversal of the district court’s judgment affirming a decision of the bankruptcy court. Appellant’s principal contention is the same as that presented below: that the bankruptcy court erred in refusing to consider parole evidence that the escrow agreement and lease signed by the parties was, in fact, a security device and that appellant was therefore the owner of the disputed property.

Having carefully reviewed the record and considered appellant’s contentions, we have determined that the district court correctly resolved the issues presented. We therefore affirm on the basis of the district court’s well reasoned opinion 58 B.R. 554 (C.D.Cal.1985), which we adopt as our own.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks reversal of the district court’s judgment affirming a decision of the bankruptcy court. Appellant’s principal contention is the same as that presented below: that the bankruptcy court erred in refusing to consider parole evidence that the escrow agreement and lease signed by the parties was, in fact, a security device and that appellant was therefore the owner of the disputed property.

Having carefully reviewed the record and considered appellant’s contentions, we have determined that the district court correctly resolved the issues presented. We therefore affirm on the basis of the district court’s well reasoned opinion 58 B.R. 554 (C.D.Cal.1985), which we adopt as our own.

Welsh v. Casa Romantica by the Sea, J.V., 786 F.2d 369, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23565 (9th Cir. 1986).

Pincite

786 F.2d 369 (Welsh v. Casa Romantica by the Sea, J.V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related