Welsh v. Allen

54 Cal. 211
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1880·No. No. 6262·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Department No. 2, Sharpstein, J.:

The transcript on appeal consists of a notice of motion to have Isaac Levy substituted as plaintiff in the place of appellant Welch, copies of affidavits in support of and in opposition to said motion, the order granting the motion, notice of appeal from that order, undertaking, stipulation as to service of notice of appeal, filing of undertaking, and waiving the printing of [212] complaint and answers in the transcript. A motion is made to dismiss the appeal, on the ground, among others, that as it does not appear that the order was made after judgment, no appeal ■lies from it.

Treated in that- light, the order is certainly one from which no appeal will lie. But it is contended on behalf of appellant, that, by whatever name it be called, it is in effect a final judgment as between appellant and respondent. We cannot concur in this view of it. But if we did, another difficulty of equal magnitude would confront us. The transcript before us does not contain a copy of the judgment roll, or óf a bill of exceptions, or of a statement in the case. (Code Civ. Proc. § 950.) If this were an appeal from a final judgment, and we had the judgment roll before us, we could not consider any affidavits, unless they were embodied in a bill of exceptions, or statement settled in due form.

Appeal dismissed.

Thornton, P. J., and Myrick, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Welsh v. Allen, 54 Cal. 211 (Cal. 1880).

54 Cal. 211 (Welsh v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelson v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
179 Cal. App. 4th 633 (California Court of Appeal, 2009)
Busing v. Pierson
102 P.2d 798 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Grey v. Pierson
38 Cal. App. 2d 577 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Sears v. Dunbar
91 P. 145 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1907)
Nolan v. Smith
70 P. 166 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Grant v. Los Angeles & Pacific Railway
47 P. 872 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Gilman v. Bootz
22 P. 255 (California Supreme Court, 1889)