Welsh, Philip v. Kevin Bowling d/b/a Tri-Star Home Solutions, LLC

2018 TN WC 106
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJuly 19, 2018
Docket2017-06-2158
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 TN WC 106 (Welsh, Philip v. Kevin Bowling d/b/a Tri-Star Home Solutions, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welsh, Philip v. Kevin Bowling d/b/a Tri-Star Home Solutions, LLC, 2018 TN WC 106 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

FILED Jul 19, 2018

08:50 AM(CT)

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE Philip Welsh, ) Docket No. 2017-06-2158 Employee, ) V. ) State File No. 91361-2017 Kevin Bowling, d/b/a Tri-Star Home ) Solutions, LLC, ) Judge Kenneth M. Switzer

Employer. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING REQUESTED RELIEF

This case came before the Court on July 18 on Philip Welsh’s Request for Expedited Hearing. The central legal issue is whether Mr. Welsh is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in proving that his injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment with Kevin Bowling, d/b/a Tri-Star Home Solutions, LLC. For the reasons below, the Court holds Mr. Welsh established he is likely to prevail and is entitled to the requested medical and temporary disability benefits.

History of Claim

Mr. Bowling hired Mr. Welsh as a fulltime laborer for his home construction business for $25 per hour. On October 20, 2017, Mr. Welsh fell approximately fifteen feet from a roof to the concrete below, injuring his wrist, head and spine. Mr. Bowling took him to St. Thomas Rutherford, which transferred him to Vanderbilt University Medical Center. He underwent surgery to repair a wrist fracture the following day. His surgeon restricted him from work as of October 21. After he recovered from surgery, Mr. Welsh participated in physical therapy for the spinal fracture. He remained off work until January 24, 2018, when Dr. Jaron Sullivan returned him to work without restrictions. He later returned to work with a different employer.

Communications between Mr. Welsh and Mr. Bowling deteriorated after the accident, as Mr. Welsh realized that his employer had no insurance on the date of injury. He filed a Petition for Benefit Determination on November 27. Afterward, the Bureau’s

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION Compliance Unit investigated the injury and Mr. Bowling’s insurance coverage status on the date of injury. The investigator wrote in a report that Mr. Bowling had workers’ compensation in the past and at the time of his report, but “his insurance had lapsed, so he had no coverage when the accident happened.” Travelers, Mr. Bowling’s carrier, filed a Notice of Denial, which confirmed, “This claim is denied for no policy in effect for accident.”

The investigator further stated that Mr. Welsh suffered an injury arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment after July 1, 2015; he was a Tennessee resident on the date of injury; and he provided notice of his injury and Mr. Bowling’s lack of insurance to the Bureau within sixty days of the injury. Mr. Bowling did not return the investigator’s call, nor did he file any documents to rebut these findings.

Ultimately, both St. Thomas and Vanderbilt did not charge Mr. Welsh for his treatment. However, Mr. Welsh introduced bills and receipts totaling $537.99 for out-of- pocket expenses for his treatment. Mr. Welsh also tracked the miles he drove for his various treatments. He made five roundtrips from his home where the journeys were fifteen miles or more for a total of 193 miles. Mr. Welsh asked the Court to order payment of his medical bills and mileage, as well as temporary total disability benefits from the time of injury until January 24, 2018.' Mr. Bowling did not attend the hearing, although the Bureau sent him a notice by certified mail, which was delivered.”

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Welsh need not prove every element of his claim by a preponderance of the evidence to obtain relief at an expedited hearing. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Instead, he must present sufficient evidence from which this Court might determine he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. /d.; Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2017).

' Mr. Welsh also argued that he returned to work at a lower rate of pay because he suffered permanent impairment from the work injury. Therefore, he contended Mr. Bowling should compensate him for his diminished earning ability. This argument supports his entitlement to permanent partial disability benefits. However, Mr. Welsh introduced no evidence that his physician assigned an impairment rating, nor is his entitlement to permanent partial disability benefits checked as an issue on the Dispute Certification Notice. Therefore, the request is not properly before this Court at this time. See Tenn. Code Ann. §239(b)(1) (‘[O]nly issues that have been certified by a workers’ compensation mediator within a dispute certification notice may be presented to the workers’ compensation judge for adjudication.”).

* Mr. Bowling received an automatically-generated email reminding him of the upcoming expedited hearing sent via TNComp on July 15. He replied to the notice on July 18 at 3:13 a.m. to ask about where the hearing would occur. The Court Clerk responded at 8:38 a.m., providing the Bureau’s address and stating that the hearing would begin at 9:00 a.m. Mr. Welsh must prove he suffered an injury as defined under the Workers’ Compensation Law. Specifically, he must show he suffered “an injury by accident... arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14). If he establishes an injury, then Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6- 204(a)(1)(A) requires “[t]he employer or the employer’s agent [to] furnish, free of charge to the employee, such medical . . . treatment . . . made reasonably necessary by accident[.]” In addition, when an injured worker is required to travel to a medical provider located outside a radius of fifteen miles from the insured worker’s residence, the employee shall be reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses. See Tenn. Code Ann. 50-6-

204(a)(3)(D(6)(A).

Applying these principles, Mr. Welsh testified that he fell approximately fifteen feet to the concrete while working for Mr. Bowling, resulting in severe injuries. The Court finds Mr. Bowling had notice of the hearing but failed to appear. Thus, Mr. Welsh’s testimony and documentary evidence are undisputed, and the Court holds Mr. Welsh suffered a specific injury arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment. Mr. Bowling is responsible for past and ongoing medical treatment and must reimburse Mr. Welsh in the amounts of $537.99 for out-of-pocket medical expenses and $90.71 for mileage.”

Regarding his request for past temporary total disability benefits, Mr. Welsh must prove (1) total disability from working as the result of a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection between the injury and his inability to work; and (3) the duration of the period of disability. Shepherd v. Haren Constr. Co., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016).

Here, Mr. Welsh suffered an injury arising primarily out of his employment, and the Court finds Dr. Sullivan totally restricted him from work due to the injury from October 21, 2017, through January 24, 2018, a period of ninety-five days. Therefore, Mr. Welsh established he is entitled to the requested temporary disability benefits. Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-207(1)(A) provides, “[for injuries] producing temporary total disability, [an injured employee is entitled to] sixty-six and two-thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the average weekly wages” during the period of disability. Mr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 239
Tennessee § 239(b)(1)
§ 50-6
Tennessee § 50-6
§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(14)
§ 50-6-204
Tennessee § 50-6-204(a)(6)(A)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)
§ 50-6-801
Tennessee § 50-6-801(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 TN WC 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welsh-philip-v-kevin-bowling-dba-tri-star-home-solutions-llc-tennworkcompcl-2018.