Welsh, Bebout & Hill v. Willis
89 F.2d 1009, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3686
Opinion
It appearing that the record presents no reviewable question because (1) it contains no finding of fact, and (2) it does not appear that the facts stated in the certificate of the referee were accepted by the District Judge, rule 34, clause 2 (b) of this court; Hiller v. Olmstead, 54 F.(2d) 5, 7 (C.C.A.6) ; In re Meifert, 57 F.(2d) 861 (C.C.A.6), it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Welsh, Bebout & Hill v. Willis, 89 F.2d 1009, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3686 (6th Cir. 1937).
89 F.2d 1009 (Welsh, Bebout & Hill v. Willis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hiller v. Olmstead
54 F.2d 5 (Sixth Circuit, 1931)
Hyman v. Meifert
57 F.2d 861 (Sixth Circuit, 1932)