Welsh, Bebout & Hill v. Willis

Sixth Circuit

Welsh, Bebout & Hill v. Willis

89 F.2d 1009, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3686

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 9, 1937

DocketNo. 7579

StatusPublished

This text of 89 F.2d 1009 (Welsh, Bebout & Hill v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Welsh, Bebout & Hill v. Willis, 89 F.2d 1009, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3686 (6th Cir. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the record presents no reviewable question because (1) it contains no finding of fact, and (2) it does not appear that the facts stated in the certificate of the referee were accepted by the District Judge, rule 34, clause 2 (b) of this court; Hiller v. Olmstead, 54 F.(2d) 5, 7 (C.C.A.6) ; In re Meifert, 57 F.(2d) 861 (C.C.A.6), it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the record presents no reviewable question because (1) it contains no finding of fact, and (2) it does not appear that the facts stated in the certificate of the referee were accepted by the District Judge, rule 34, clause 2 (b) of this court; Hiller v. Olmstead, 54 F.(2d) 5, 7 (C.C.A.6) ; In re Meifert, 57 F.(2d) 861 (C.C.A.6), it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 F.2d 1009, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welsh-bebout-hill-v-willis-ca6-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack