Welsbach Street Lighting Co. of America v. Johnston
This text of 2 Balt. C. Rep. 162 (Welsbach Street Lighting Co. of America v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition of the plaintiff that the answer filed by the defendants, other than the defendant James J. Johnston, may be taken from the files and not received, because • the same is verified by the affidavit of only one of said defendants, being heard and submitted after argument by counsel.
And it appearing that said answer is responsive, and is sufficient to put the cause at issue, and that no exceptions have been filed to the same:
It is thereupon ordered this 14th day of June, 1901, that the said petition be and the same is hereby dismissed.
' Whether or not it is necessary that the said answer should be sworn to by each one of said defendants, in order to make it sufficient to support a motion to dissolve the injunction, is a question which does not arise on this petition,
See Mahaney vs. Lazier, 16 Md. 69.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Balt. C. Rep. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welsbach-street-lighting-co-of-america-v-johnston-mdcirctctbalt-1901.