Welsbach Street Lighting Co. of America v. Johnston

2 Balt. C. Rep. 162
CourtBaltimore City Circuit Court
DecidedJune 14, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Balt. C. Rep. 162 (Welsbach Street Lighting Co. of America v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welsbach Street Lighting Co. of America v. Johnston, 2 Balt. C. Rep. 162 (Md. Super. Ct. 1901).

Opinion

RITCHIE, J.—

The petition of the plaintiff that the answer filed by the defendants, other than the defendant James J. Johnston, may be taken from the files and not received, because • the same is verified by the affidavit of only one of said defendants, being heard and submitted after argument by counsel.

And it appearing that said answer is responsive, and is sufficient to put the cause at issue, and that no exceptions have been filed to the same:

It is thereupon ordered this 14th day of June, 1901, that the said petition be and the same is hereby dismissed.

' Whether or not it is necessary that the said answer should be sworn to by each one of said defendants, in order to make it sufficient to support a motion to dissolve the injunction, is a question which does not arise on this petition,

See Mahaney vs. Lazier, 16 Md. 69.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mahaney v. Lazier
16 Md. 69 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Balt. C. Rep. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welsbach-street-lighting-co-of-america-v-johnston-mdcirctctbalt-1901.