Welsbach Light Co. v. New York Chemical Refining Co.

95 F. 1007, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3204

This text of 95 F. 1007 (Welsbach Light Co. v. New York Chemical Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welsbach Light Co. v. New York Chemical Refining Co., 95 F. 1007, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3204 (circtsdny 1899).

Opinion

I .ACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The Helouis process for treatment of lime crayons, which is relied upon as an anticipation in this case, seems quite different in object and result from that of the patent. Within the range of equivalents indicated by Judge Townsend in the Sunlight Incandescent Gas Lamp Case. 87 Fed. 221, the process of defendant is an infringement. Preliminary injunction accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welsbach Light Co. v. Sunlight Incandescent Gas Lamp Co.
87 F. 221 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 F. 1007, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welsbach-light-co-v-new-york-chemical-refining-co-circtsdny-1899.