WELLSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY v. Suttles
This text of 262 S.W.3d 266 (WELLSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY v. Suttles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Darius Suttles (Suttles), d/b/a Dionn Security Systems, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a non-jury trial on Wellston Housing Authority’s (WHA) petition against Suttles alleging breach of contract and negligence. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The trial court’s judgment is support by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 S.W.3d 266, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1137, 2008 WL 3905970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wellston-housing-authority-v-suttles-moctapp-2008.