Wells v. Wilson

21 A. 445, 140 Pa. 645, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 886
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 9, 1891
DocketNo. 196
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 21 A. 445 (Wells v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells v. Wilson, 21 A. 445, 140 Pa. 645, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 886 (Pa. 1891).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think the evidence was sufficient to take the note in suit out of the statute. That there was a distinct identification of the debt, and that it was still due and unpaid, appears from the testimony of the defendant himself, and if the plaintiff is believed, there was a promise to pay it. In any event, there was such a clear and unambiguous acknowledgment of the note, as a subsisting obligation, as is consistent with a promise to pay. This, under the authorities, is sufficient: Landis v. Roth, 109 Pa. 624.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Osborne v. Ridgebury Township
35 Pa. D. & C. 169 (Bradford County Court of Common Pleas, 1939)
Mitchell, Receiver of the Liberty Clay Products Co.
139 A. 853 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Maniatakis' Estate
101 A. 920 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A. 445, 140 Pa. 645, 1891 Pa. LEXIS 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-wilson-pa-1891.