Wells v. Wells
535 A.2d 792, 148 Vt. 633, 1987 Vt. LEXIS 535
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wells v. Wells. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 Vt. 1 →
Opinion
The order granting defendant permission to take an interlocutory appeal does not set forth a controlling question of law, nor is this Court able to discern such a question from the materials presented to us. The interlocutory appeal having been improvidently granted is hereby dismissed. V.R.A.P. 5(b); see In re Pyramid Co., 141 Vt. 294, 302, 449 A.2d 915, 919 (1982), Lyon v. Bennington College Corp., 137 Vt. 135, 136, 400 A.2d 1010, 1011 (1979).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wells v. Wells, 535 A.2d 792, 148 Vt. 633, 1987 Vt. LEXIS 535 (Vt. 1987).
535 A.2d 792 (Wells v. Wells) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lyon v. Bennington College Corp.
400 A.2d 1010 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1979)
In Re Pyramid Co. of Burlington
449 A.2d 915 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1982)