Wells v. . the City of Buffalo

80 N.Y. 253, 1880 N.Y. LEXIS 91
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 24, 1880·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Rapallo, J.

The sole ground upon which the assessment complained of is sought to be set aside being that the act authorizing it is unconstitutional, this action cannot be maintained. If the act is unconstitutional no assessment imposed *254 under it can be a cloud upon the plaintiffs’ title. It is void upon its face. If the act is constitutional the assessment is valid. In either case, therefore, the complaint was properly dismissed. (Stewart v. Palmer, 74 N. Y., 183.)

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells v. . the City of Buffalo, 80 N.Y. 253, 1880 N.Y. LEXIS 91 (N.Y. 1880).

80 N.Y. 253 (Wells v. . the City of Buffalo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Alexander v. District Court
29 Colo. 182 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1901)
Wason v. Major
10 Colo. App. 181 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1897)
Tifft v. City of Buffalo
7 N.Y.S. 633 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1889)
Phelps v. . Mayor, Etc., of New York
19 N.E. 408 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Weidersum v. Naumann
62 How. Pr. 369 (New York Supreme Court, 1881)