Wells v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Wells v. State

810 S.W.2d 179, 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 158, 1990 WL 153935

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 10, 1990

DocketNo. 749-87

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 810 S.W.2d 179 (Wells v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wells v. State, 810 S.W.2d 179, 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 158, 1990 WL 153935 (Tex. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

MILLER, Judge.

Our original opinion in this cause, Wells v. State, No. 749-87 delivered April 4,1990, is withdrawn.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. V.T.C.A. Penal Code § 29.03. The jury also assessed appellant’s punishment, which was sixty years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.¹ On direct appeal, appellant raised ten points of error, and the court of appeals reversed appellant’s conviction and remanded the cause to the trial court for a new trial based on its disposition of points of error numbers one and two. See Wells v. State, 730 S.W.2d 782 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987). In those two points, the court of appeals held the admission at trial of an extraneous offense was error which contributed to the jury’s verdict at punishment. Id. at 788; Tex.R.App.Proc. 81(b)(2). We thereafter granted the State’s petition for discretionary' review to determine whether the court of appeals erred in holding the admission of the extraneous offense was improper.

We addressed that issue in our opinion now withdrawn. Upon issuance of that opinion, appellant filed this motion for rehearing pointing out that there were critical factual inaccuracies in the opinion which were relied upon to reach the disposition. We granted appellant’s motion for rehearing on May 2, 1990. Those inaccuracies are now corrected by our withdrawal of the opinion.

We also now refuse the State’s original petition for discretionary review. This trial was held in April of 1986, prior to the effective date of the Rules of Criminal Evidence ², and the court of appeals addressed appellant’s points of error under the applicable case law. The admissibility of an extraneous offense is now governed by Tex.R.Crim.Evid. 404(b). Thus, we find that a resolution of the issue raised in the State’s petition would neither contribute to the jurisprudence of this State nor be justified under Tex.R.App.Proc. 200.

The State’s petition for discretionary review, filed in this Court on July 9, 1987, is refused.

McCORMICK, P.J., and DAVIS, J., dissent. STURNS, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

MILLER, Judge.

Our original opinion in this cause, Wells v. State, No. 749-87 delivered April 4,1990, is withdrawn.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery. V.T.C.A. Penal Code § 29.03. The jury also assessed appellant’s punishment, which was sixty years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.¹ On direct appeal, appellant raised ten points of error, and the court of appeals reversed appellant’s conviction and remanded the cause to the trial court for a new trial based on its disposition of points of error numbers one and two. See Wells v. State, 730 S.W.2d 782 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987). In those two points, the court of appeals held the admission at trial of an extraneous offense was error which contributed to the jury’s verdict at punishment. Id. at 788; Tex.R.App.Proc. 81(b)(2). We thereafter granted the State’s petition for discretionary' review to determine whether the court of appeals erred in holding the admission of the extraneous offense was improper.

We addressed that issue in our opinion now withdrawn. Upon issuance of that opinion, appellant filed this motion for rehearing pointing out that there were critical factual inaccuracies in the opinion which were relied upon to reach the disposition. We granted appellant’s motion for rehearing on May 2, 1990. Those inaccuracies are now corrected by our withdrawal of the opinion.

We also now refuse the State’s original petition for discretionary review. This trial was held in April of 1986, prior to the effective date of the Rules of Criminal Evidence ², and the court of appeals addressed appellant’s points of error under the applicable case law. The admissibility of an extraneous offense is now governed by Tex.R.Crim.Evid. 404(b). Thus, we find that a resolution of the issue raised in the State’s petition would neither contribute to the jurisprudence of this State nor be justified under Tex.R.App.Proc. 200.

The State’s petition for discretionary review, filed in this Court on July 9, 1987, is refused.

McCORMICK, P.J., and DAVIS, J., dissent. STURNS, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

810 S.W.2d 179, 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 158, 1990 WL 153935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-state-texcrimapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack