Wells v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Wells v. State

1912 OK CR 57, 119 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 715, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 303

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 16, 1912·No. No. A-1144.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court ■of Marshall county, at the January, 1911, term, of selling intoxicating liquor, and on the 18th day of February, thereafter, was adjudged to pay a fine of fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. The proof upon which the conviction is based is very unsatisfactory. There are other irregularities complained of, and upon the whole record we think this judgment should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court ■of Marshall county, at the January, 1911, term, of selling intoxicating liquor, and on the 18th day of February, thereafter, was adjudged to pay a fine of fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. The proof upon which the conviction is based is very unsatisfactory. There are other irregularities complained of, and upon the whole record we think this judgment should be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. It is so ordered.

Wells v. State, 1912 OK CR 57, 119 P. 1134, 6 Okla. Crim. 715, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 303 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 57 (Wells v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.