Wells v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wells v. State

811 S.W.2d 73, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 1991 WL 125472

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 9, 1991·No. No. 59410·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, George Wells, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file and find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. In addition, we find that the motion court did not err in denying appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion. Appellant’s appeal of the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, George Wells, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file and find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. In addition, we find that the motion court did not err in denying appellant’s Rule 24.035 motion. Appellant’s appeal of the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Wells v. State, 811 S.W.2d 73, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1073, 1991 WL 125472 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

811 S.W.2d 73 (Wells v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.