Wells v. State

899 So. 2d 506, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5567, 2005 WL 925615
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wells v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 881 So. 2d 54
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 2005·No. No. 5D05-1011·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Wells petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus to file a belated motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He alleges that after he was convicted and sentenced in 1975, he hired an attorney to timely file such a motion, but it was never filed. We deny the petition without prejudice for Wells to petition the trial court, the proper forum, for a writ of habeas corpus. See Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931, 934 (Fla.1999). Upon receiving the petition, the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether trial counsel undertook to file a 3.850 motion, but failed to do so in a timely manner. If Wells prevails at the hearing, he may then file a belated 3.850 motion. Steele at 934.

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells v. State, 899 So. 2d 506, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5567, 2005 WL 925615 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

899 So. 2d 506 (Wells v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steele v. Kehoe
747 So. 2d 931 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)