Wells v. State

75 So. 176, 16 Ala. App. 31, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 102
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 10, 1917
Docket4 Div. 454.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 75 So. 176 (Wells v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells v. State, 75 So. 176, 16 Ala. App. 31, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 102 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder and was tried and convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and from a judgment of conviction he appeals.

The only error complained of is the refusal of the court to continue the case a second time. We have examined the facts as shown by tbe bill of exceptions, and we are of the opinion that the trial court gave to the defendant every right to which he was entitled, and this case is affirmed on the authority of Brand v. State, 13 Ala. App. 390, 69 South. 379.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wells
76 So. 998 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 So. 176, 16 Ala. App. 31, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-state-alactapp-1917.