Wells v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Wells v. State

75 So. 176, 16 Ala. App. 31, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 102

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 1917·No. 4 Div. 454.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder and was tried and convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and from a judgment of conviction he appeals.

The only error complained of is the refusal of the court to continue the case a second time. We have examined the facts as shown by tbe bill of exceptions, and we are of the opinion that the trial court gave to the defendant every right to which he was entitled, and this case is affirmed on the authority of Brand v. State, 13 Ala. App. 390, 69 South. 379.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder and was tried and convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and from a judgment of conviction he appeals.

The only error complained of is the refusal of the court to continue the case a second time. We have examined the facts as shown by tbe bill of exceptions, and we are of the opinion that the trial court gave to the defendant every right to which he was entitled, and this case is affirmed on the authority of Brand v. State, 13 Ala. App. 390, 69 South. 379.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Wells v. State, 75 So. 176, 16 Ala. App. 31, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 102 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

75 So. 176 (Wells v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related