Wells v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Wells v. State

292 So. 2d 475, 52 Ala. App. 356, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1085

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 15, 1974

Docket6 Div. 405

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 292 So. 2d 475 (Wells v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wells v. State, 292 So. 2d 475, 52 Ala. App. 356, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1085 (Ala. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

*357 AFTER REMANDMENT

In accordance with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama in this case, we have made a determination as to whether the error furnishing the basis for the judgment probably injuriously affected substantial rights of appellant-defendant. After an examination and review of the entire record, we are of the opinion that it does not appear that said error probably injuriously affected substantial rights of the appellant-defendant. In accordance with Supreme Court Rule 45, Title 7, Appendix, Code of Alabama 1940, Recompiled 1958, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Judges concur except CATES, P. J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*357 AFTER REMANDMENT

In accordance with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama in this case, we have made a determination as to whether the error furnishing the basis for the judgment probably injuriously affected substantial rights of appellant-defendant. After an examination and review of the entire record, we are of the opinion that it does not appear that said error probably injuriously affected substantial rights of the appellant-defendant. In accordance with Supreme Court Rule 45, Title 7, Appendix, Code of Alabama 1940, Recompiled 1958, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Judges concur except CATES, P. J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 So. 2d 475, 52 Ala. App. 356, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-state-alacrimapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack