Wells v. State

292 So. 2d 475, 52 Ala. App. 356, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1085
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1974·No. 6 Div. 405·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*357 AFTER REMANDMENT

In accordance with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama in this case, we have made a determination as to whether the error furnishing the basis for the judgment probably injuriously affected substantial rights of appellant-defendant. After an examination and review of the entire record, we are of the opinion that it does not appear that said error probably injuriously affected substantial rights of the appellant-defendant. In accordance with Supreme Court Rule 45, Title 7, Appendix, Code of Alabama 1940, Recompiled 1958, we conclude that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Judges concur except CATES, P. J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells v. State, 292 So. 2d 475, 52 Ala. App. 356, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1085 (Ala. Ct. App. 1974).

292 So. 2d 475 (Wells v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Bayne
375 So. 2d 1239 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1979)
Frazier v. State
365 So. 2d 339 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1978)
Wells v. State
292 So. 2d 476 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1974)