Wells v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wells v. Smith

229 S.W.3d 621, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1048, 2007 WL 2034163

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 17, 2007

DocketED 89034

StatusPublished

This text of 229 S.W.3d 621 (Wells v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wells v. Smith, 229 S.W.3d 621, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1048, 2007 WL 2034163 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Jeffrey Griffin and Brenda Griffin on plaintiffs’ personal injury action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished *622 with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Jeffrey Griffin and Brenda Griffin on plaintiffs’ personal injury action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished *622 with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 S.W.3d 621, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1048, 2007 WL 2034163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-smith-moctapp-2007.