Wells v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wells v. Smith

229 S.W.3d 621, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1048, 2007 WL 2034163

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 17, 2007·No. ED 89034·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Jeffrey Griffin and Brenda Griffin on plaintiffs’ personal injury action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished *622 with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Jeffrey Griffin and Brenda Griffin on plaintiffs’ personal injury action. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished *622 with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Wells v. Smith, 229 S.W.3d 621, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1048, 2007 WL 2034163 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

229 S.W.3d 621 (Wells v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.