Wells v. Romero

New Mexico Supreme Court

Wells v. Romero

159 P. 1001, 22 N.M. 191

CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 5, 1916

DocketNo. 1885

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 159 P. 1001 (Wells v. Romero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wells v. Romero, 159 P. 1001, 22 N.M. 191 (N.M. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OP THE COURT.

PARKIER, J.

Appellant recovered a judgment before a justice of the peace for $9.51 against the appellee. From this judgment the appellant appealed to the district court, where the judgment of the justice of the peace was affirmed and final judgment rendered. Thereafter, and prior to the taking of the appeal to this court, the appellee paid into court the amount of this judgment, which was accepted and received by the appellant in full settlement and satisfaction of the judgment.' Thereafter he appealed to this court. Under such circumstances the right to review the judgment' had been waived and lost to the appellant. 3 C. J. p. 681, § 554.

It follows that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.'

Roberts, C.J., and Hanna, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OP THE COURT.

PARKIER, J.

Appellant recovered a judgment before a justice of the peace for $9.51 against the appellee. From this judgment the appellant appealed to the district court, where the judgment of the justice of the peace was affirmed and final judgment rendered. Thereafter, and prior to the taking of the appeal to this court, the appellee paid into court the amount of this judgment, which was accepted and received by the appellant in full settlement and satisfaction of the judgment.' Thereafter he appealed to this court. Under such circumstances the right to review the judgment' had been waived and lost to the appellant. 3 C. J. p. 681, § 554.

It follows that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.'

Roberts, C.J., and Hanna, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 P. 1001, 22 N.M. 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-romero-nm-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack