Wells v. Poland

198 N.E. 764, 292 Mass. 465, 1935 Mass. LEXIS 1270
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 25, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 198 N.E. 764 (Wells v. Poland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells v. Poland, 198 N.E. 764, 292 Mass. 465, 1935 Mass. LEXIS 1270 (Mass. 1935).

Opinion

Lummus, J.

The plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to her declaration in tort alleging that the defendant was negligent in acting for her as an attorney in certain probate proceedings in 1923 and 1924. Many negligent acts and omissions are alleged, but one defect is common to all the allegations. Damage is an essential part of a cause of action for negligence, and must be alleged. Without lengthening this opinion by an analysis of each allegation, it is enough to say that no damage to the plaintiff is sufficiently alleged. Baldwin v. Western Railroad Corp. 4 Gray, 333. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 147, “Declarations in Actions of Tort.”

Order sustaining demurrer affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holland v. Good Bros.
61 N.E.2d 544 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1945)
Levin v. Reliance Co-operative Bank
16 N.E.2d 88 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 N.E. 764, 292 Mass. 465, 1935 Mass. LEXIS 1270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-poland-mass-1935.