Wells v. Philbin
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION JEREMY JOHN WELLS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) CV 120-164 ) WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN; UNIT ) MANAGER CLIFORD BROWN; ) CORRECTION OFFICER FLUKER; ) CORRECTION OFFICER MOSS; ) CORRECTION OFFICER WADE; ) CORRECTION OFFICER EVERET; and ) CORRECTION OFFICER WOODS, ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which objections have been filed. (Doc. no. 7.) Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2), and DISMISSES this action without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002) (per curiam), SO ORDERED this 3@5”*day 2021, at Augusta, Georgia. Ly Uf >KABAZLDPAL YT RANDAL HALI4Z CHIEF JUDGE STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wells v. Philbin (Wells v. Philbin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.