Wells v. PEO. OF ILL. EX REL. ILL. SCHOLARSHIP

37 B.R. 687, 16 Educ. L. Rep. 1250
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedFebruary 2, 1984
Docket83 C 7177, 80 B 14841 and 82 A 1357
StatusPublished

This text of 37 B.R. 687 (Wells v. PEO. OF ILL. EX REL. ILL. SCHOLARSHIP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells v. PEO. OF ILL. EX REL. ILL. SCHOLARSHIP, 37 B.R. 687, 16 Educ. L. Rep. 1250 (N.D. Ill. 1984).

Opinion

37 B.R. 687 (1984)

In the Matter of Geraldine WELLS, Petitioner-Appellee, Debtor,
v.
PEOPLE OF the State of ILLINOIS, ex rel., ILLINOIS STATE SCHOLARSHIP COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellant, Creditor.

Nos. 83 C 7177, 80 B 14841 and 82 A 1357.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

February 2, 1984.

Robert L. Edwards, Chicago, Ill., for debtor/plaintiff.

Josh Hershman, Chicago, Ill., for State of Ill.

DECISION

McMILLEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff is a bankrupt, and defendant has filed an appeal from a decision by Bankruptcy Judge Toles dated June 24, 1983, 37 B.R. 684, in which he found that *688 plaintiff's debt for an educational loan in the amount of $5,573.20 had been discharged. Specifically, Judge Toles found:

Plaintiff's financial condition is such that she and her family are already living at poverty level. The fact that Plaintiff is attempting to repay a portion of her student loans is evidence of her good faith. Therefore, the Court finds that exception from discharge of the student loan obligation to the Illinois State Scholarship Commission would impose an undue hardship on this Debtor and her dependents.

The foregoing conclusion was arrived at after Judge Toles heard the testimony of the plaintiff, and his decision is final unless "clearly erroneous" under Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8013. Judge Toles applied 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8)(B) which allows discharge of an educational loan if the debt would "impose undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor's dependents." The evidence supports Judge Toles' findings of fact and conclusions of law. They are not clearly erroneous.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed with prejudice and the finding of the bankruptcy judge that plaintiff's debt to the defendant is discharged is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 B.R. 687, 16 Educ. L. Rep. 1250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-peo-of-ill-ex-rel-ill-scholarship-ilnd-1984.