Wells v. Pacific Railroad

35 Mo. 164
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJuly 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 35 Mo. 164 (Wells v. Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells v. Pacific Railroad, 35 Mo. 164 (Mo. 1864).

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The petition in the case states that one William Miller, and two other persons who were then employed as agents and servants of defendant, were injured by a collision on the road of defendant, and plaintiffs were called upon as physicians by the agent of said company to attend to the said employees so injured; that, at the instance and request of the agent of defendant, plaintiffs rendered their services as phy-. sicians to said persons injured, and for which plaintiffs say that defendant owes them.

There was judgment for plaintiffs. The judgment must be reversed. The petition is defective in that it does not allege any promise by the defendant, or any fact from which the law would imply a promise. The allegation that the services were rendered at the instance and request of the agent of the defendant, is not an averment that they were rendered at the instance and request of the defendant itself. The defendant was not liable for the personal expenses of its servants or employees, unless such liability was assumed by contract; and if such contract shall have been made by a supposed agent of the defendant, the authority (special or general) of the agent must be proved as in any other case.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Judge Dry den concurs; Judge Bay absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Electric Household Stores, Inc. v. Hostetter
89 S.W.2d 28 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1935)
Hartz v. Page
20 S.W.2d 701 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1929)
Wetmore v. Crouch
51 S.W. 738 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
Maupin v. Virginia Lead Mining Co.
78 Mo. 24 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Mo. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-pacific-railroad-mo-1864.