Wells v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 258 A.D. 986 (Wells v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action on a policy of ordinary life insurance, defendant appeals from an order of the Appellate Term, affirming a judgment of the City Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered on her motion to strike out the answer and for summary judgment. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The question in the case is whether a dividend, coneededly ascertained and apportioned by defendant to the policy in suit, extended the insurance to the date of the insured’s death. Under subdivision 1 of section 83 of the Insurance Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 28), which regulates the payment of dividends on ordinary policies, the dividend in question had that effect. . Defendant has incorporated in its form of ordinary policy, and relies on here as a defense, language taken from subdivision 2 of section 83, permitting deferred payments of dividends on industrial policies only. That language has no application to an ordinary policy. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ. [171 Misc. 878.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 986, 18 N.Y.S.2d 170, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1940.