Wells v. Howard
This text of 123 N.Y.S. 1148 (Wells v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and for that reason the judgment and order are reversed, and a new trial granted, on condition that the plaintiff pay the costs of the trial and disbursements to date. See, also, 129 App. Div. 926, 114 N. Y. Supp. 1150, and 134 App. Div. 925, 118 N. Y. Supp. 1149.
THOMAS, J., dissents as to defendant William J. Howard.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-howard-nyappdiv-1910.