Wells v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

433 So. 2d 43, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20217
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 21, 1983
DocketNo. AK-222
StatusPublished

This text of 433 So. 2d 43 (Wells v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 433 So. 2d 43, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20217 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Wells contends that the Florida Parole and Probation Commission erred in establishing his PPRD based on a salient factor score of RCF. Not so.

The Florida Parole and Probation Commission identified the four felonies needed for RCF and they are supported by the record.

The other issues argued by Wells were not presented to the Commission, therefore, not preserved for appeal.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 So. 2d 43, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1983.