Wells v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
This text of 433 So. 2d 43 (Wells v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Wells contends that the Florida Parole and Probation Commission erred in establishing his PPRD based on a salient factor score of RCF. Not so.
The Florida Parole and Probation Commission identified the four felonies needed for RCF and they are supported by the record.
The other issues argued by Wells were not presented to the Commission, therefore, not preserved for appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
433 So. 2d 43, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1983.