Wells v. Eustace
This text of 612 So. 2d 453 (Wells v. Eustace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal involves an election contest. The circuit court correctly held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the contest and that any contest of a primary election must be pursued before the executive committee of the party holding the election. We affirm on the authority of Ex parte Graddick, 495 So.2d 1367 (Ala.1986); Ex parte Baxley, 496 So.2d 688 (Ala.1986); Ex parte Baxley, 494 So.2d 30 (Ala.1986); and Ex parte Skidmore, 277 Ala. 221, 168 So.2d 483 (1964).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
612 So. 2d 453, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 17, 1993 WL 5556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-eustace-ala-1993.