Wells v. Bennett
135 A. 146, 100 N.J. Eq. 358, 15 Stock. 358, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 569
This text of 135 A. 146 (Wells v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wells v. Bennett, 135 A. 146, 100 N.J. Eq. 358, 15 Stock. 358, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 569 (N.J. 1926).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ricardo v. Kelly
41 A.2d 901 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1945)
Lockwood v. Clarke
41 A.2d 37 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Simpkins v. Simpkins
24 A.2d 821 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Bonded B. L. Assn. v. Konner
180 A. 570 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Gardner v. Vanlandingham
69 S.W.2d 947 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1934)
U.S. Trust Co. v. Jamison
148 A. 398 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 A. 146, 100 N.J. Eq. 358, 15 Stock. 358, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-bennett-nj-1926.