Wells v. . Bartlett
101 N.E. 1125, 208 N.Y. 574, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1163
This text of 101 N.E. 1125 (Wells v. . Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wells v. . Bartlett, 101 N.E. 1125, 208 N.Y. 574, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1163 (N.Y. 1913).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Cuddebaok and Hogan, JJ. Not sitting: Miller, J. _
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
101 N.E. 1125, 208 N.Y. 574, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-bartlett-ny-1913.