Wells v. Arnold

228 A.D. 851

This text of 228 A.D. 851 (Wells v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells v. Arnold, 228 A.D. 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Order, in so far as it denies motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint for insufficiency or to make the complaint more definite and certain and separately state and number the allegations thereof, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In so far as it denies motion to extend defendant’s time to answer, order reversed upon the facts, without costs, and motion granted, without costs; defendant to have ten days from service of a copy of the order herein within which to serve an answer. In the circumstances defendant is entitled to this relief. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D. 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-arnold-nyappdiv-1930.