Wells Fargo, N.A. v. Cali Cravens, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Roger L. Cravens

2024 Ark. App. 557
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 6, 2024
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2024 Ark. App. 557 (Wells Fargo, N.A. v. Cali Cravens, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Roger L. Cravens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells Fargo, N.A. v. Cali Cravens, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Roger L. Cravens, 2024 Ark. App. 557 (Ark. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 557 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-23-398

WELLS FARGO, N.A. Opinion Delivered November 6, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 04PR-21-870]

CALI CRAVENS, AS PERSONAL HONORABLE CHRISTINE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE HORWART, JUDGE OF ROGER L. CRAVENS, DECEASED APPELLEE REMANDED TO SETTLE AND SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge

Appellant Wells Fargo appeals the March 20, 2023 order of the Benton County

Circuit Court denying its claims against the estate of Roger L. Cravens, deceased, in the

amount of $281,947.51. The circuit court denied the claim based on the provisions of

Arkansas Code Annotated section 28-50-109;1 however, appellant contends that its claim

against the estate was not based on a secured claim but was premised on Roger’s personal

guarantee. We remand to settle and supplement the record.

The record shall be compiled in accordance with the rules of the Arkansas Supreme

Court and Court of Appeals.2 The record in civil cases consists of the pleadings, judgment,

1 (Repl. 2012). 2 Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 6(a). decree, order appealed, transcript, exhibits, and certificates.3 If anything material to either

party is omitted from the record, either by error or by accident, we may direct that the

omission or misstatement be corrected and, if necessary, that a supplemental record be

certified and transmitted.4

Here, neither the security agreement nor the personal guarantee is included in the

record submitted to us. There is no doubt that both documents are material to our decision.

Therefore, we remand to the circuit court to settle and supplement the record within thirty

days from the date of this opinion.

Remanded to settle and supplement the record.

HARRISON, C.J., and GLADWIN, J., agree.

Conner & Winters, LLP, by: Todd P. Lewis, for appellant.

Robert S. Tschiemer, for appellee.

3 Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 3-1(n).

4 See Marziale v. Brown, 2024 Ark. App. 282.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 Ark. App. 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-na-v-cali-cravens-as-personal-representative-of-the-estate-arkctapp-2024.