Wells Fargo Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Barot

2019 NY Slip Op 927
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 6, 2019
DocketIndex No. 706594/15
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 927 (Wells Fargo Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Barot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells Fargo Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Barot, 2019 NY Slip Op 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, Natl. Assn. v Barot (2019 NY Slip Op 00927)
Wells Fargo Bank, Natl. Assn. v Barot
2019 NY Slip Op 00927
Decided on February 6, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 6, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
HECTOR D. LASALLE
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2017-04464
(Index No. 706594/15)

[*1]Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, etc., respondent,

v

Sanjay Barot, etc., appellant.


Peter A. Joseph, New York, NY, for appellant.

Sandelands Eyet LLP, New York, NY (Kathleen Cavanaugh of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Sanjay Barot appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Timothy J. Dufficy, J.), entered March 21, 2017. The order denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 2221(d) to reargue, in effect, inter alia, his prior motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(2) and (3) to dismiss the complaint, which motion was denied by an order of the same court entered May 18, 2016.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

No appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Landmark Capital Partners, LLC v Greaves, 164 AD3d 573; Boakye-Yiadom v Roosevelt Union Free School Dist., 57 AD3d 929). Thus, the appeal must be dismissed.

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, LASALLE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boakye-Yiadom v. Roosevelt Union Free School District
57 A.D.3d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-bank-natl-assn-v-barot-nyappdiv-2019.