Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Walker

Ohio Supreme Court

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Walker

939 N.E.2d 190, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1493

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 6, 2011

Docket2010-1673

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 939 N.E.2d 190 (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Walker, 939 N.E.2d 190, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1493 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 09AP-947. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On September 24, 2010, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.4(A)(4), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.4(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.4(C),

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 09AP-947. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On September 24, 2010, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.4(A)(4), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.4(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.4(C),

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.6.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

939 N.E.2d 190, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-bank-na-v-walker-ohio-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack