Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Spence

213 So. 3d 1142, 2017 WL 1278067, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4639
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 2017·No. No. 3D15-1409·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[1143]*1143 ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., the plaintiff below, appeals the trial court’s order granting final summary judgment in favor of the defendants below, Derrick R. Spence and Helen Spence, and dismissing the instant mortgage foreclosure action. The trial court found that the action was barred by-the statute of limitations.

Based upon the record before us and the Spences’ commendable confession of error, we reverse the final order of dismissal and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. See Bartram v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, Nos. SC14-1265, SC14-1266, SC14-1305, 211 So.3d 1009, 2016 WL 6538647 (Fla. Nov. 3, 2016); Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Americas v. Beauvais, 188 So.3d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (en banc).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Spence, 213 So. 3d 1142, 2017 WL 1278067, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4639 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

213 So. 3d 1142 (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Spence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deutsche Bank v. Sfl Property Holding LLC
237 So. 3d 1125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. BH-NV Investments 1, LLC
230 So. 3d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)