Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Spence

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Spence

213 So. 3d 1142, 2017 WL 1278067, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4639

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 5, 2017

DocketNo. 3D15-1409

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 213 So. 3d 1142 (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Spence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Spence, 213 So. 3d 1142, 2017 WL 1278067, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4639 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

[1143]*1143 ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., the plaintiff below, appeals the trial court’s order granting final summary judgment in favor of the defendants below, Derrick R. Spence and Helen Spence, and dismissing the instant mortgage foreclosure action. The trial court found that the action was barred by-the statute of limitations.

Based upon the record before us and the Spences’ commendable confession of error, we reverse the final order of dismissal and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings. See Bartram v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, Nos. SC14-1265, SC14-1266, SC14-1305, 211 So.3d 1009, 2016 WL 6538647 (Fla. Nov. 3, 2016); Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Americas v. Beauvais, 188 So.3d 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (en banc).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI