Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sims

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedNovember 24, 2021
Docket3:21-cv-01128
StatusUnknown

This text of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sims (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sims, (M.D. Fla. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:21-cv-1128-TJC-PDB

SHA’RON A. SIMS,

Defendant.

ORDER This case is before the Court sua sponte. Pro se defendant Sha’ron A. Sims removed the underlying state case, No. 16-2015-CA-003618, from the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida, on November 8, 2021. Doc. 1. She then filed an Amended Notice of Removal three days later. Doc. 3. This is the second time she has removed this 2015 foreclosure case. Wells Fargo Bank v. Sims, 3:21-cv-166-TJC-PDB (M.D. Fla.). The Court previously remanded the case based on numerous procedural defects. See Order Remanding Case, Doc. 16, 3:21-cv-166-TJC-PDB. Sims has appealed the Court’s remand of that case in that proceeding, and the appeal is still pending. Docs. 18, 19, 3:21-cv-166-TJC-PDB. The present Notices of Removal contain nonsensical and irrelevant arguments including whether the Court invoked equity and whether the Court’s original judgment was void. Docs. 1 at 1–2; 3 at 3–4. None of the arguments alter any of the reasons for remand in the previous case.

The Court has warned Sims that “any future misbegotten effort to invoke the Court’s jurisdiction will likely lead to an award of fees.” Doc. 16 at 6–7, 3:21- cv-166-TJC-PDB. Because attorneys for Wells Fargo have not yet filed notices of appearance, the Court will not impose fees at this time. However, Sims is

again informed that “[a]n order remanding [a] case may require payment of just costs and any actual expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred as a result of the removal.” Gonzalez v. J.C. Penney Corp., 209 F. App'x 867, 869 (11th Cir. 2006) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)). If Sims chooses to remove this case to

federal court yet again, the Court will hear a motion from Wells Fargo for attorney’s fees and costs, and will likely grant it. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. The case is REMANDED to the Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida. 2. Defendant Sims’ Motion to Pay Docketing Fees in Installments is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida the 24th day of November, 2021.

o> Cimothe . Corrigan Ww. TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN United States District Judge

agb Copies: Pro se plaintiff Fourth Judicial Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cinthia Gonzalez v. J.C. Penney Corporation
209 F. App'x 867 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sims, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-bank-na-v-sims-flmd-2021.