Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Prentice
This text of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Prentice (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Prentice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 16-JAN-2026 07:59 AM Dkt. 79 ODMR
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EBONI A. PRENTICE, Defendant-Appellant, THE MAUI LANI COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 2-10; DOE ENTITIES 1-10; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10, Defendants,
THE MAUI LANI COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendant/Counterclaimant- Appellee, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,
THE MAUI LANI COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendant/Cross-Claimant- Appellee, v. EBONI A. PRENTICE, Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant- Appellant, and JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 2-10; DOE ENTITIES 1-10; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10, Defendants/Cross-Claim Defendants,
and
THE MAUI LANI COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendant/Additional Cross- Claimant-Appellee, v. SUNRUN, INC., Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN ROES 1-10; JANE ROES 1-10; ROE PARTNERSHIPS; ROE CORPORATIONS; ROE ENTITIES 1-10; and ROE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10, Defendants-Additional Cross-Claim Defendants
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 2CC161000169) NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
ORDER (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Hiraoka and McCullen, JJ.)
Upon review of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion for Reconsideration of the Summary Disposition Order Issued November 28, 2025, filed on December 8, 2025, the papers in support, the December 23, 2025 response, and the record, the motion presents no point of law or fact we overlooked or misapprehended. See Rule 40(b), Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 16, 2026.
/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge
/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge
/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Prentice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-bank-na-v-prentice-hawapp-2026.