Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Owen

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Owen

171 A.3d 1051, 327 Conn. 955

DecidedNovember 2, 2017

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.3d 1051 (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Owen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Owen, 171 A.3d 1051, 327 Conn. 955 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the defendants Marlene E. Owen and William S. Owen for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 174 Conn.App. 102, 165 A.3d 275 (2017), is granted, limited to the following question:

"What is the proper standard of review of a motion to open judgment based on allegations of fraud, and did the Appellate Court properly apply that standard to refuse to order an evidentiary hearing on the motion given the facts and circumstances of this case?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the defendants Marlene E. Owen and William S. Owen for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 174 Conn.App. 102, 165 A.3d 275 (2017), is granted, limited to the following question:

"What is the proper standard of review of a motion to open judgment based on allegations of fraud, and did the Appellate Court properly apply that standard to refuse to order an evidentiary hearing on the motion given the facts and circumstances of this case?"

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.3d 1051, 327 Conn. 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-bank-na-v-owen-conn-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack