Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Noble

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., : Case No. 1:22-cv-714 Plaintiff, : Judge Matthew W. McFarland : GEORGIA NOBLE, et al., Defendants.

ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 5) The Court has reviewed the Order and Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 5), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the following: 1. Defendant Nicole Hatton’s petition for removal of a state court action to this Court is DENIED; 2. Defendant Hatton’s Motion to Obtain Electronic Filing Rights is DENIED as moot; 3. This matter is TERMINATED from the Court’s docket; 4. This matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas in Hamilton County,

Ohio; and 5. Itis CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), that, for the reasons outlined in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5), an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Therefore, Defendant Hatton is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Defendant Hatton is hereby ADVISED that she remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178, F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 199), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997). IT IS SO ORDERED. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Wels By: JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND