Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Jose S. Rodriguez
This text of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Jose S. Rodriguez (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Jose S. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-21-00155-CV
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellant § On Appeal from the 236th District Court
§ of Tarrant County (236-314048-19) V. § March 17, 2022
JOSE S. RODRIGUEZ, Appellee § Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there
was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s
judgment is reversed in part and affirmed in part. We reverse the trial court’s
judgment on Appellant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A’s breach-of-contract and attorney’s-
fee claims, render judgment for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. on its breach-of-contract
claim for $6,047.85, and remand the issue of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s attorney’s fees
to the trial court. We affirm the rest of the trial court’s judgment. We further order that Appellee Jose S. Rodriguez must pay all costs of this
appeal.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By /s/ Elizabeth Kerr Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Jose S. Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-bank-na-v-jose-s-rodriguez-texapp-2022.