Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Horn

5 N.E.3d 668, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1452
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 26, 2014·No. 2013-1534·Published

Opinion

Lorain App. No. 12CA010230, 2013-Ohio-2374. Reported in 137 Ohio St.3d 1473, 2014-Ohio-176, 2 N.E.3d 268. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted as to Proposition of Law No. I. The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

French, J., would grant the motion as to both Propositions of Law. Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Horn, 5 N.E.3d 668, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1452 (Ohio 2014).

5 N.E.3d 668 (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Horn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Horn
2013 Ohio 2374 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)