Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Eddie Hunt

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 31, 2014
• Docket: 13-2450
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2450

WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., Successor to Wachovia Bank N. A., formerly known as First Union National Bank,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EDDIE D. HUNT; TERESA HUNT, a/k/a Teresa T. Hunt,

Defendants – Appellants,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting by and through its agency Internal Revenue Service; MCM ASSOCIATES, INC., d/b/a ServPro of Southeast Greenville,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (6:13-cv-01333-MGL)

Submitted: March 27, 2014 Decided: March 31, 2014

Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie D. Hunt, Teresa Hunt, Appellants Pro Se. James Y. Becker, Emily H. Farr, HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER & BOYD, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Eddie D. Hunt and Teresa Hunt appeal the district

court’s order remanding the underlying action to South Carolina

state court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Subject to exceptions not applicable here, “[a]n order

remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is

not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C.A. § 1447(d)

(West Supp. 2013); see E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc., 722

F.3d 574, 581–83 (4th Cir. 2013). Because the district court’s

order does not fall within any of the exceptions provided by §

1447, the order is not appealable.

We therefore dismiss the Hunts’ appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the material before this court and

argument will not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED